Maya, three sessions over twelve days is exactly the kind of consistency that actually moves a score — not a single marathon, real spaced practice. That gives me something better than a snapshot: I can show you a genuine trend, not just where you stand today.

Let's start with what's actually working, because there's a real story here. In your first session, cell signaling and membrane receptors sat at 40% — rough, but a starting point. By your second session, it had climbed to 58%. Today, it's at 71%. That's not noise. That's a real, three-session upward trend, and whatever you changed between session one and now — slower reading, better first-principles understanding, more careful elimination — it's working. Keep doing it.

Here's your highest-leverage next move: fluids and Poiseuille's law. Your accuracy there has actually stayed flat across all three sessions, sitting around 15-20% each time — and unlike membrane receptors, this one isn't improving on its own. Look at why: across all three sessions combined, 11 of your 13 wrong answers here are classified as misreads, not conceptual errors. You understand the physics. You're consistently answering a different question than the one being asked, and it's happening every single session, not just once. That repetition across three separate sittings tells me this is a real habit, not a bad day — and habits need a deliberate fix: read the stem twice, out loud if you have to, before you look at the answer choices.

There's a pattern worth naming directly across your evening sessions specifically. Your session-two numbers (evening) came in meaningfully lower than session one (morning) and session three (afternoon) — and it's not one bad night, it's the second time in three tries. Combined with more fast-wrong answers showing up specifically in that evening session, this looks like fatigue compounding an already-rushed pace, consistently, not randomly.

One more thing showing up across sessions: you changed six answers total across the three runthroughs, and four of those went from correct to wrong. That ratio has held steady session to session — this isn't a one-time slip, it's a pattern in how you're handling doubt. Your first instinct is outperforming your second-guessing, consistently.

Here's what to do before your next session:

1. Keep doing whatever you're doing on membrane receptors — it's working, three sessions running.
2. On fluids and Poiseuille's law specifically, read every stem twice before touching the answers.
3. Move your next session earlier in the day if you can — your evening numbers have been your weakest twice now.
4. Trust your first answer unless you can name a specific, concrete reason to change it.

Three sessions in, you already have real, visible proof that deliberate practice is working in at least one area. Let's get fluids moving the same way.

— Dr. Miles